The Sky’s the limit – or is it?
The case of Sky v SkyKick was referred to the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) by the High Court on a number of points. The CJEU provided its ruling on the case earlier this year.
The claim began when the broadcaster Sky brought trade mark infringement proceedings against SkyKick, a cloud software company, in respect of the use of its trade mark. Sky claimed that “SkyKick” infringed its trade marks by being sufficiently similar and that it was being used for products and services which were covered by Sky’s registrations. The trade marks relied on by Sky contained a number of broad terms such as “computer software” in a number of classes. Sky also argued that it would cause confusion to the public who would assume that SkyKick was a sub-brand of Sky.
However, SkyKick argued that its business was different to that of Sky. Sky’s business is predominantly media and entertainment and whilst some of its goods and services relate to computer software, Sky did not have a direct interest in cloud computing software. SkyKick argued that if Sky does not have a direct interest in cloud computing software then why should it be allowed to exert rights over industries unrelated to it. SkyKick counterclaimed by arguing that Sky’s trade marks should be declared invalid on the grounds that the specifications of goods and services are unclear and that the trade mark applications were made in bad faith by Sky.
Mr Justice Arnold (or Lord Justice Arnold as he is now known) concluded that the counterclaim pursued by SkyKick would require guidance from the CJEU. Several questions were referred to the CJEU, including the following:
- Can use of broad terms mean a registered trade mark is so unclear or imprecise that it should be revoked?
- Is it bad faith to apply to register a trade mark without any intention to use it in relation to the specified goods/services?
The CJEU provided its ruling in January 2020 and ruled that:
- A trade mark registered in good faith cannot be ruled invalid on the grounds that the terms designating the goods or services the trade mark covers are unclear.
- A trade mark application made without any intention to use the trade mark in relation to the goods and service covered by the registration constitutes bad faith.
- When the absence of the intention to use the trade mark in accordance with the essential functions of a trade mark concerns only certain goods or services referred to in the application for registration, that application constitutes bad faith only in so far as it relates to those goods or services.
What does this mean for trade mark owners?
The decision appears to be good news for owners of trade marks which contain broad terms such as “computer software” as the decision confirms that a trade mark registration will not be invalidated simply because it contains broad terms which lack clarity and precision. The decision will also come as a relief to owners of trade marks who will not risk invalidating their trade marks by making overly broad applications for registration, often as part of a defensive filing strategy.
However, the full implications of this recent ruling will not become clear until it is applied when the case is returned to the High Court.
The Sky’s the limit – or is it?
The case of Sky v SkyKick was referred to the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) by the High Court on a number of points. The CJEU provided its ruling on the case earlier this year. The claim began when the broadcaster Sky brought trade mark infringement proceedings against SkyKick, a cloud software company,…
Three key reasons why you should have a partnership agreement in place
If you are entering into a partnership or you are a partner of an existing partnership then having a Partnership Agreement in place is strongly recommended. However, often partnerships do not have one in place as it is not a legal requirement to have a Partnership Agreement. This results in the default position of the…
An Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights – Trade Marks
A trade mark allows a company or business to protect a mark, which distinguishes its product or brand allowing it to be easily recognisable to its customers. Danielle Austin explains the key aspects of a trade mark. What is a trade mark? Under the Trade Marks Act 1994 a trade mark is any sign capable…
Are you aware of the new changes to the PSC regime?
From 30th June 2016 UK companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) were required to declare the individuals or entities who had the right to exercise significant control over them. These individuals or entities are known as Persons with Significant Control (PSCs). Danielle Austin, explains more. A PSC is an individual or entity who holds more…
How will the General Data Protection Regulation affect your business?
The General Data Protection Regulation (also known as GDPR) was approved by the EU Parliament in April 2016 and the UK government has confirmed that despite Brexit the GDPR will be implemented in the UK from 25 May 2018. The GDPR will affect how businesses process and protect personal data and it is essential that…
5 reasons why you need a shareholder’s agreement
There is no legal requirement to have a shareholders’ agreement in place, although any company which has more than one shareholder is advised to have one. So, if it is not a requirement you might be thinking why should you invest your money in one? Danielle Austin, highlights five reasons why you should: Minority shareholder…