Have the curtains been pulled on overlooking?

Darren Millis, Head of the Commercial Property team at Geoffrey Leaver, looks at the recent case of Fearn v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery in the Court of Appeal

The recent court case between the Tate Gallery and the owners of apartments adjacent to the Tate Gallery has been extremely newsworthy. The Tate Gallery has a well-used viewing platform affording pleasing views of the River Thames and Central London but, unfortunately, includes views into the apartments of individuals in the residential development opposite. These apartments benefit from panoramic windows which also allow noteworthy views of Central London but, and this is the issue, do allows members of the public on the viewing platform at the Tate Gallery next door visual access into the apartments. This has had, according to the apartment owners, a detrimental impact on the quality of their lives.

The owners of the apartments brought a claim for an injunction against the Tate Gallery requiring the Gallery to close the viewing platform under two headings : common law private nuisance and under the Human Rights Act 1988 (the right to privacy). The High Court had found against the apartment owners.

The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court and dismissed the claim, and found that overlooking does not fall within the scope of common law nuisance. The Court of Appeal were uncomfortable with the concept of extending the boundaries of common law nuisance to encompass overlooking and felt it was more appropriate for Parliament to deal with this issue if it were minded to do so. The Court of Appeal refused to utilise the Human Rights Act for much the same reason.

What does this mean for residents?

This case reminds us that it is important when buying any real estate to look at the use now, but also potential use of any neighbouring buildings in the future. The court will not automatically ride to the rescue of anyone being “overlooked” by occupiers of a neighbouring building.

If you have any questions or need help from one of our property lawyers contact dmillis@geoffreyleaver.com or call 01908 692769.

Darren Millis | Commercial Property Partner

Commercial Property

Have the curtains been pulled on overlooking?

Darren Millis | Feb 2020

Darren Millis, Head of the Commercial Property team at Geoffrey Leaver, looks at the recent case of Fearn v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery in the Court of Appeal The recent court case between the Tate Gallery and the owners of apartments adjacent to the Tate Gallery has been extremely newsworthy. The…

The importance of keeping pre-contract enquiries up-to-date

Michael Harrigan | Apr 2019

First Tower Trustees Ltd v CDS (Superstores International) Ltd Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Overview In replies to pre-contract enquiries prior to entering into a lease, the landlords stated that they had not been notified of any actual, potential or alleged breaches of environmental law or any other environmental problems relating to the property but…

Landlords looking to reject the renewal of a commercial tenancy with a view to carrying out works?

Michael Harrigan | Apr 2019

Summary of S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Limited [2018] UKSC 62 Overview The Supreme Court considered whether a Landlord can refuse the grant of a new tenancy under Ground (f) where the proposed scheme of works was devised solely to comply with that Ground. S.30 (1) (f) of the Landlord and Tenant…

FROM APRIL 2018, A NEW LEGAL STANDARD FOR MINIMUM ENERGY EFFICIENCY WILL APPLY TO RENTED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.

Darren Millis | Mar 2018

Darren Millis, Head of Commercial Property looks at this new legislation in more detail and how this will affect Landlords. What is the minimum energy efficiency standard (MEES)? The minimum energy efficiency standard (MEES) was introduced in March 2015 by the Energy Efficiency (Private Rented Property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015. The MEES Regulations originate…

Can terms be implied into an Overage Agreement?

Darren Millis | Dec 2017

Case law has determined rules for implying terms into commercial agreements. Darren Millis, Commercial Property Partner highlights a recent case which demonstrates the issue with implying terms into overage agreements. The Law The established rule is that a term can only be implied into a contract where it is : necessary for business efficacy ;…

Do restrictive covenants imposed prior to 1926 bind land?

Darren Millis | Dec 2017

Case law has swung over the years favouring first developer and then neighbouring landowner in respect of the enforceability of restrictive covenants, and their ability to prevent, ultimately, development of land. Darren Millis, Commercial Property Partner highlights a recent case which demonstrates the difficulties of enforcing restrictive convenants to prevent development. The Law The rules…

Months

All

Have the curtains been pulled on overlooking?

What does this mean for residents?

Commercial Property

Have the curtains been pulled on overlooking?

Commercial Property

The importance of keeping pre-contract enquiries up-to-date

Commercial Property

Landlords looking to reject the renewal of a commercial tenancy with a view to carrying out works?

Commercial Property

FROM APRIL 2018, A NEW LEGAL STANDARD FOR MINIMUM ENERGY EFFICIENCY WILL APPLY TO RENTED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.

Commercial Property

Can terms be implied into an Overage Agreement?

Commercial Property

Do restrictive covenants imposed prior to 1926 bind land?

ARCHIVE

Categories

Months