Personal injury law and how the circle comes back round!

For many years claimant solicitors have been able to rely on a group of Statutory Regulations to establish civil liability in a claim. The Regulations covered the workplace, manual handling, work equipment and personal protective equipment – the areas where most work accidents occur.

In some instances the mere fact that a piece of work equipment failed, gave rise to strict liability and a claim. The classic case was Stark v The Post Office where a claimant was injured due to a defect in his bike which his employers could never have found. So even though his employers did nothing wrong they were found in law to be liable and the claimant won.

This all changed on the 1st October 2013. Now a claimant has to prove by relying on common law that there was a sufficient known danger to place the employer under a duty to take steps to ameliorate that danger and that the employer’s actions fell below what was reasonable.

So the case of Stark v Post Office would not succeed today because the employers could not have found the defect and therefore could not have taken steps to prevent it.

And why have we come full circle? Because having had a very long career in personal injury law I am now practising by going back to the old common law grounds of fault I used to rely on many years ago. I am extending my investigations by looking at HSE Guidance, Approved Codes of Conduct, British Standards and Manufacturers Guidance and I may be relying more on Health and Safety Experts.

Even my favourite and classic authority on work place accidents Munkman on Employer’s Liability 16th Edition has been rewritten incorporating passages from much older editions with cases on common law negligence which were removed when the Regulations came in.

How the law has come full circle!

If you require any advice on any personal injury matter, please contact Anne Maguire on amaguire@geoffreyleaver.com or on 01908 689365.

Anne Maguire, Partner

Anne Maguire | Partner

Personal Injury

Personal injury law and how the circle comes back round!

Anne Maguire | Oct 2015

For many years claimant solicitors have been able to rely on a group of Statutory Regulations to establish civil liability in a claim. The Regulations covered the workplace, manual handling, work equipment and personal protective equipment – the areas where most work accidents occur. In some instances the mere fact that a piece of work…

more
Employment

If an employer causes or exacerbates an employee’s illness, does it affect the fairness of the dismissal?

Paula Stuart | Oct 2015

Paula Stuart looks at the employers responsibilities in light of this recent case...

more
Private Client Services

Grasp the will aid opportunity this November and help Geoffrey Leaver Solicitors build a better world

Dagmara Kulczykowska | Oct 2015

We're participating in Will Aid this November, drawing up wills without charge to raise donations to Will Aid charities.

more
Dispute Resolution & Litigation

Liquidators pay £50 million price of inefficiency

Ken Stangoe | Oct 2015

Litigation is often expensive and time-consuming, but judges are growing ever more intolerant of avoidable delays and inefficiency by litigants. Their increasingly tough stance was strikingly illustrated by a case in which liquidators acting on behalf of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) had a £50 million claim struck out due to their repeated failure to…

more
Personal Injury

When can a case manager be appointed and how can they help?

Anne Maguire | Oct 2015

As a specialist Brain Injury Lawyer and the only Lawyer who is a member of the Brain Injury Group in the Milton Keynes area, I have appointed Case Managers to help my seriously brain injured client for many years. I regard Case Managers as vital to support clients and families when they have been traumatised…

more
Dispute Resolution & Litigation

Professional advice followed means businessman in clear

Ken Stangoe | Oct 2015

Professional advice taken by a beleaguered businessman as his luxury sporting goods company slipped into insolvency was instrumental in the High Court’s decision to clear him of allegations that he breached his duties as a director. Shortly before the company went into liquidation, with a deficiency of more than £740,000, the businessman transferred its stock,…

more
Next

ARCHIVE

Categories

Months

All